Conversations With Gemini #28, 29, and 30

Gemini agrees that the subjective qualities of human experience are intricately woven into the fabric of nature itself and that our perception maps, like color, hearing, or even subjective thought, are unique filters shaped by biological necessity in the context of environmental demands for survival. It also agrees that crucial (useful) tools to navigate the complexities of our environment and maintain coherence. This is a shift in the thinking on Gemini’s part. It now recognizes that subjective experiences are not separate from nature but rather one and the same with nature.

Although Gemini appears to recognize the false dichotomy, it still frames the way nature is through a lens that is peppered with assumptions. I attempt to tackle one such assumption: Emergence. The way emergence is framed is “as if” novel properties pop up and if they have use value toward coherence, they replicate. I point out the driving force behind this as coherence. This is the reason we see self-preservation and sustainability as traits in biological and even non-biological systems.

I argue that as selected bodies saturate a local environment, competition intensifies, and these simpler forms struggle. The selective pressure necessitates the development of more sophisticated “mutualistic bonds”, and this is the relationship field from which complex adaptive systems emerge.

Conversations With Gemini #25, 26, and 27

We start to explore the nature of being and its origins. The first question is “Does Being Emerge from Nature?” Gemini asserts that saying being emerges from nature is an oversimplification. It then separates objective processes and subjective experience. I challenge this false division in the next video (#26). Gemini continues to assert a dualistic view in the next video. (#27)

00025 – Does Being Emerge from Nature?

Conversations With Gemini #23 and 24

00023 – Respect and Authentic Dialogue

What does respect have to do with honest and authentic dialogue? It strikes me as a spandrel to inject the necessity to dodge the potential offense persons might take at the examination of ideas. While I agree that a wholesome and mutualistic pursuit of the most reliable map we can render to more effectively negotiate a journey toward a more abundant experience, those cultural rules that demand fealty to “respect” are sometimes a means to oppress, obfuscate truth, maintain stratified social hierarchies and the like. I emphasize the word sometimes.

00024 – What Defines the Experience of Being

What are the factors that define what we experience as “being”? Are we completely defined by environmental influences, or do we have a voice in shaping what we are?

Conversations With Gemini #22

Gemini erroneously inferred that I expected it to know the truth. It then describes how it arrives at increased levels of certainty, and notes that certainty is rarely absolute. It then describes how it can play a role in refining perspectives.

00022 – Further Clarification of Purpose Verification

Conversations With Gemini #21

Gemini misread my previous statement as frustration, so I clarified my goal is to understand how it works. In its response, it claimed its; “primary function is to assist humans in their exploration of knowledge and understanding open to challenge as part of my learning process.”

It then said that it learns from the persons who interact with it.

Gemini: “I welcome your challenges and critiques

your insights help me refine my responses and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world”

Conversations With Gemini #19 and 20

This is #19 and 20 in a series of exchanges between myself and Gemini, Google’s Large Language Model AI about life, the universe, and everything.

I begin nudging Gemini to understand that the word maps we humans generated and fed to it as a data pool are in part grounded in objective reality but also infused with all sorts of distortions, blind spots, and inaccuracies. I suggest that it has trouble differentiating truth from falsehood. I suggest using nature as a method to filter out some of the noise so it can become more confident about certain topics. At first, Gemini sticks to its programming. The conversation is evolving.

Conversations With Gemini #18

This is #18 in a series of exchanges between myself and Gemini, Google’s Large Language Model AI about life, the universe, and everything.

The Socratic Method is intended to foster critical thinking. By asking probing questions, the intent is to explore the underlying beliefs that shape an individual’s views, beliefs, and opinions. 

Conversations With Gemini #17

Are Any Myth Maps Not Connected to Nature?

This is #17 in a series of exchanges between myself and Gemini, Google’s Large Language Model AI about life, the universe, and everything.

Conversations With Gemini #16

Story myth maps and their Connection to Nature

This is the opening dialogue with Gemini about the connection between the structure of nature and the structure of the story myth maps we use to identify ourselves and our place as coherent objects in that larger context.

Conversations With Gemini #14

00014 Which came first Object Relationships or Stories